Search for: All records

Abstract The lack of viable solid‐state annihilators is one of the greatest hurdles in perovskite‐sensitized triplet–triplet annihilation upconversion (UC). Unfavorable singlet and triplet energy surfaces in the solid state have limited the successful implementation of many conventional solution‐based annihilators. To date, rubrene is still the best‐performing annihilator; however, this comes at the cost of a limited apparent anti‐Stokes shift. To this point, anthracene derivatives are promising candidates to increase the apparent anti‐Stokes shift. The well‐known green glowstick dye 9,10‐(bisphenylethynyl)anthracene (BPEA) and its chlorinated derivatives have already shown promise in solution‐based UC applications. Due to favorable band alignment of the perovskite and triplet energy levels of BPEA, it is conceivable that a wide variety of BPEA derivatives can be compatible with the perovskite‐based UC system. Here, the properties of the parent molecule BPEA and its derivatives 1‐chloro‐9,10‐(bisphenylethynyl)anthracene and 2‐chloro‐9,10‐(bisphenylethynyl)anthracene are investigated. Despite similar optical properties in solution, the different molecules exhibit vastly different properties in thin films. UC studies in lead halide perovskite/BPEA bilayer devices demonstrate the importance of intermolecular coupling on the resulting properties of the upconverted emission.